<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zeroanthropology.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zeroanthropology.net</link>
	<description>Turning and turning in the widening gyre &#124; The falcon cannot hear the falconer &#124; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold &#124; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world &#124; The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere &#124; The ceremony of innocence is drowned &#124; The best lack all conviction, while the worst &#124; Are full of passionate intensity. -- W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Leavenworth Diary: Double Agent Anthropologist Inside the Human Terrain System by Anthropology News</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/all-posts/the-leavenworth-diary-double-agent-anthropologist-inside-the-human-terrain-system/#comment-24222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthropology News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/#comment-24222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] closely with the US Army’s Human Terrain System programs in Afghanistan. (See anthropologist John Allison’s report on Zero Anthropology ) The textbooks currently used in the schools of Afghanistan are produced by [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] closely with the US Army’s Human Terrain System programs in Afghanistan. (See anthropologist John Allison’s report on Zero Anthropology ) The textbooks currently used in the schools of Afghanistan are produced by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE WRITERS by Ignacio Santoyo</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/about-the-bloggers/#comment-18345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignacio Santoyo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openanthropology.wordpress.com/about-the-blogger/#comment-18345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing important to say, just CONGRATULATIONS for this blog. Sorry for my broken english.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing important to say, just CONGRATULATIONS for this blog. Sorry for my broken english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? by Katinka Barysch questions if Europe and Turkey missed an opportunity at the Arab spring. And a Libya roundup&#8230; &#124; Erkan&#039;s Field Diary</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/31/libya-what-revolution-whose-revolution/#comment-17653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katinka Barysch questions if Europe and Turkey missed an opportunity at the Arab spring. And a Libya roundup&#8230; &#124; Erkan&#039;s Field Diary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 08:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12785#comment-17653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Humanitarian-Militarist Project and the Production of Empire in Libya by Current Items March 25-April 1 &#124; Living Anthropologically</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/26/the-humanitarian-militarist-project-and-the-production-of-empire-in-libya/#comment-17650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Current Items March 25-April 1 &#124; Living Anthropologically]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12742#comment-17650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 26: &#8220;The Humanitarian-Militarist Project and the Production of Empire in Libya.&#8221; Exceptionally trenchant analysis, with comprehensive links and updates from Zero [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 26: &#8220;The Humanitarian-Militarist Project and the Production of Empire in Libya.&#8221; Exceptionally trenchant analysis, with comprehensive links and updates from Zero [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? by Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? (via ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY) &#124; Rolandrjs&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/31/libya-what-revolution-whose-revolution/#comment-17649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? (via ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY) &#124; Rolandrjs&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12785#comment-17649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? (via ZERO&#160;ANTHROPOLOGY)  Posted on March 31, 2011 by rolandrjs    From UK Prime Minister David Cameron&#039;s opening speech at the London Conference on Libya, 29 March 2011: &quot;Today is about a new beginning for Libya – a future in which the people of Libya can determine their own destiny, free from violence and oppression. But the Libyan people cannot re &#8230; Read More [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? (via ZERO&nbsp;ANTHROPOLOGY)  Posted on March 31, 2011 by rolandrjs    From UK Prime Minister David Cameron&#039;s opening speech at the London Conference on Libya, 29 March 2011: &quot;Today is about a new beginning for Libya – a future in which the people of Libya can determine their own destiny, free from violence and oppression. But the Libyan people cannot re &#8230; Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya: What Revolution? Whose Revolution? by John Allison</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/31/libya-what-revolution-whose-revolution/#comment-17648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Allison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12785#comment-17648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems a good time to contemplate the significance of this Libyan Guernica in the light of cultural relativity; in light of the limited reality that has been constructed by the USans that allow them to be so sure that God is on their side and everyone who disagrees with their construction is a Bad Guy.
Consider these dated but timeless quotes:

&quot;Physical reality seems to recede in proportion as man’s symbolic activity advances. Instead of dealing with the things themselves, man is in a sense constantly conversing with himself. He has so enveloped himself in linguistic forms, in artistic images, in mythological symbols or religious rites that he cannot see or know anything except by the interposition of [an] artificial medium.&quot; 
Ernst Cassirer, 1956, An Essay on Man. p. 43

&quot;We know enough about language to understand that variations in the grammatical structures of languages will result in variations in what may be called “worldview”. How people think about time and space and about things and processes will be greatly influenced by the grammatical features of their language. We dare not suppose therefore that all human minds are unanimous in understanding how the world is put together; but how much more divergence there is in worldview among different cultures can be imagined when we consider the great number and variety of tools for conversation that go beyond speech. For, though culture is a creation of speech, it is recreated anew by [or better, the culture is ” renewed within ...”, J.A.] every medium of communication ….&quot;
Neil Postman, 1984, Amusing Ourselves to Death; Public discourse in the Age of Show Business. p 9]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a good time to contemplate the significance of this Libyan Guernica in the light of cultural relativity; in light of the limited reality that has been constructed by the USans that allow them to be so sure that God is on their side and everyone who disagrees with their construction is a Bad Guy.<br />
Consider these dated but timeless quotes:</p>
<p>&#8220;Physical reality seems to recede in proportion as man’s symbolic activity advances. Instead of dealing with the things themselves, man is in a sense constantly conversing with himself. He has so enveloped himself in linguistic forms, in artistic images, in mythological symbols or religious rites that he cannot see or know anything except by the interposition of [an] artificial medium.&#8221;<br />
Ernst Cassirer, 1956, An Essay on Man. p. 43</p>
<p>&#8220;We know enough about language to understand that variations in the grammatical structures of languages will result in variations in what may be called “worldview”. How people think about time and space and about things and processes will be greatly influenced by the grammatical features of their language. We dare not suppose therefore that all human minds are unanimous in understanding how the world is put together; but how much more divergence there is in worldview among different cultures can be imagined when we consider the great number and variety of tools for conversation that go beyond speech. For, though culture is a creation of speech, it is recreated anew by [or better, the culture is ” renewed within ...”, J.A.] every medium of communication ….&#8221;<br />
Neil Postman, 1984, Amusing Ourselves to Death; Public discourse in the Age of Show Business. p 9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Humanitarian-Militarist Project and the Production of Empire in Libya by David</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/26/the-humanitarian-militarist-project-and-the-production-of-empire-in-libya/#comment-17646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12742#comment-17646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember the sudden increase in the popularity of Margaret Thatcher after the victory in the Falklands war and I think the same situation will repeat when the military operation in Libya is finally successful. David Cameron will definitely be one of the winners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the sudden increase in the popularity of Margaret Thatcher after the victory in the Falklands war and I think the same situation will repeat when the military operation in Libya is finally successful. David Cameron will definitely be one of the winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya and the Passive Repeaters: Deploying Depleted Information Warheads by Maximilian Forte</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/27/libya-and-the-passive-repeaters-deploying-depleted-information-warheads/#comment-17644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maximilian Forte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12770#comment-17644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting how the passive repeaters work right here: they don&#039;t present a counter-argument, or contrary facts...they just vote down a post, perhaps voting on it for the extent to which it approximates or differs from their preferred political interpretation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how the passive repeaters work right here: they don&#8217;t present a counter-argument, or contrary facts&#8230;they just vote down a post, perhaps voting on it for the extent to which it approximates or differs from their preferred political interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya and the Passive Repeaters: Deploying Depleted Information Warheads by Maximilian Forte</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/27/libya-and-the-passive-repeaters-deploying-depleted-information-warheads/#comment-17643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maximilian Forte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12770#comment-17643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Jeremy. I might use this section for updates.

Last night, Twitter (specifically #Libya #Feb17) was alive with all sorts of celebratory tweeting and retweeting of news that the insurgents had taken Sirte, Gaddafi&#039;s hometown and a stronghold of the regime. Here are some key examples, from some of the the most retweeted accounts:

SultanAlQassemi: Al Jazeera Arabic reporter confirms that Sirte has fallen in rebels hands, says citizens celebrating. #Libya [note the media source]

EndTyranny01: CONFIRMED CONFIRMED CONFIRMED Militray sources on the ground Sirte has fallen.A clean takeover.No resistance. #Libya #Sirte #Feb17 #Benghazi

There are many more, and it turns out that the ultimate source of this was none other than a spokesman for the &quot;Transitional National Council&quot;--now recognized not just by France, but also by Qatar, Al Jazeera&#039;s sponsor, as the legitimate government--and this was broadcast by Al Jazeera without any attempt at verification, without question.

(By the way, interesting how Libya can get this new &quot;legitimate&quot; government, and the only people who voted for it are the governments of France and Qatar.)

The other news media, were much slower, if they said anything at all about Sirte, or used minimalist language that suggested, this is hearsay, a claim made by one side, no confirmation.

A couple of hours after the celebrations in Benghazi erupted--some interesting news broke: explosions in Sirte. Taken? No resistance? Unarmed? CONFIRMED?

This morning: the actual reality. Sirte was not taken, at all. In fact, the closest the insurgents got to Sirte yesterday was 80km away from the city. They had not even tried to enter it, let alone take it. Reporters in Sirte do point to the presence of many armed civilian supporters of Gaddafi. The fight has yet to start...even though NATO planes bombed targets in the city, despite the fact that Gaddafi&#039;s troops are posing no threat to the civilians there (remember, this is a bastion of support for the regime).

The opposition, with the aid of Al Jazeera, manipulative tweeters, and uncritical retweeters (the passive repeaters), all worked to produce what resembles a PSYOPS operation: the government is giving up, Gaddafi&#039;s forces are fleeing, the people are all on our side, we are getting closer, better off if you surrender, etc. That is for the domestic audience. For the international audience the message is: the NFZ is working, another success, chalk it up.

And it was all a fabrication.

This morning, some tweeted: &quot;ok it was just one of those Internet rumours.&quot; No, it was more than that. It was the work of the insurgents themselves and Al Jazeera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jeremy. I might use this section for updates.</p>
<p>Last night, Twitter (specifically #Libya #Feb17) was alive with all sorts of celebratory tweeting and retweeting of news that the insurgents had taken Sirte, Gaddafi&#8217;s hometown and a stronghold of the regime. Here are some key examples, from some of the the most retweeted accounts:</p>
<p>SultanAlQassemi: Al Jazeera Arabic reporter confirms that Sirte has fallen in rebels hands, says citizens celebrating. #Libya [note the media source]</p>
<p>EndTyranny01: CONFIRMED CONFIRMED CONFIRMED Militray sources on the ground Sirte has fallen.A clean takeover.No resistance. #Libya #Sirte #Feb17 #Benghazi</p>
<p>There are many more, and it turns out that the ultimate source of this was none other than a spokesman for the &#8220;Transitional National Council&#8221;&#8211;now recognized not just by France, but also by Qatar, Al Jazeera&#8217;s sponsor, as the legitimate government&#8211;and this was broadcast by Al Jazeera without any attempt at verification, without question.</p>
<p>(By the way, interesting how Libya can get this new &#8220;legitimate&#8221; government, and the only people who voted for it are the governments of France and Qatar.)</p>
<p>The other news media, were much slower, if they said anything at all about Sirte, or used minimalist language that suggested, this is hearsay, a claim made by one side, no confirmation.</p>
<p>A couple of hours after the celebrations in Benghazi erupted&#8211;some interesting news broke: explosions in Sirte. Taken? No resistance? Unarmed? CONFIRMED?</p>
<p>This morning: the actual reality. Sirte was not taken, at all. In fact, the closest the insurgents got to Sirte yesterday was 80km away from the city. They had not even tried to enter it, let alone take it. Reporters in Sirte do point to the presence of many armed civilian supporters of Gaddafi. The fight has yet to start&#8230;even though NATO planes bombed targets in the city, despite the fact that Gaddafi&#8217;s troops are posing no threat to the civilians there (remember, this is a bastion of support for the regime).</p>
<p>The opposition, with the aid of Al Jazeera, manipulative tweeters, and uncritical retweeters (the passive repeaters), all worked to produce what resembles a PSYOPS operation: the government is giving up, Gaddafi&#8217;s forces are fleeing, the people are all on our side, we are getting closer, better off if you surrender, etc. That is for the domestic audience. For the international audience the message is: the NFZ is working, another success, chalk it up.</p>
<p>And it was all a fabrication.</p>
<p>This morning, some tweeted: &#8220;ok it was just one of those Internet rumours.&#8221; No, it was more than that. It was the work of the insurgents themselves and Al Jazeera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya and the Passive Repeaters: Deploying Depleted Information Warheads by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/27/libya-and-the-passive-repeaters-deploying-depleted-information-warheads/#comment-17623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12770#comment-17623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Max, 

In this connection, this is one of the creepiest website I&#039;ve found thus far :

&quot;Heck yeah, Libyan revolution!&quot; :  http://thelibyanrevolution.tumblr.com


With an inspiring subtitle, &quot; your reliable source to what&#039;s happening in libya &quot; , with tons of  ready-made posts waiting to be reposted, and with the most ancient posts, about a month ago,  here:  http://thelibyanrevolution.tumblr.com/page/75

I thins it&#039;s worth checking the &quot;personal accounts&quot; of  &quot;Nadia&quot; and &quot;Zehra&quot;, linked to in the &quot;FAQ&quot; section of this website.  Creepy.

I&#039;ve not explored all of it yet, but it seems here are some of the (almost) clones :

http://feb17.info/ , starting february 17th, here : http://feb17.info/page/113/

and 

http://www.libyafeb17.com , starting february 16th, here : http://www.libyafeb17.com/page/187/

I guess it won&#039;t be online  for very much longer now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Max, </p>
<p>In this connection, this is one of the creepiest website I&#8217;ve found thus far :</p>
<p>&#8220;Heck yeah, Libyan revolution!&#8221; :  <a href="http://thelibyanrevolution.tumblr.com" rel="nofollow">http://thelibyanrevolution.tumblr.com</a></p>
<p>With an inspiring subtitle, &#8221; your reliable source to what&#8217;s happening in libya &#8221; , with tons of  ready-made posts waiting to be reposted, and with the most ancient posts, about a month ago,  here:  <a href="http://thelibyanrevolution.tumblr.com/page/75" rel="nofollow">http://thelibyanrevolution.tumblr.com/page/75</a></p>
<p>I thins it&#8217;s worth checking the &#8220;personal accounts&#8221; of  &#8220;Nadia&#8221; and &#8220;Zehra&#8221;, linked to in the &#8220;FAQ&#8221; section of this website.  Creepy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not explored all of it yet, but it seems here are some of the (almost) clones :</p>
<p><a href="http://feb17.info/" rel="nofollow">http://feb17.info/</a> , starting february 17th, here : <a href="http://feb17.info/page/113/" rel="nofollow">http://feb17.info/page/113/</a></p>
<p>and </p>
<p><a href="http://www.libyafeb17.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.libyafeb17.com</a> , starting february 16th, here : <a href="http://www.libyafeb17.com/page/187/" rel="nofollow">http://www.libyafeb17.com/page/187/</a></p>
<p>I guess it won&#8217;t be online  for very much longer now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya and the Passive Repeaters: Deploying Depleted Information Warheads by John Allison</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/27/libya-and-the-passive-repeaters-deploying-depleted-information-warheads/#comment-17622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Allison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12770#comment-17622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No doubt it is the Transitional Council - an arm of the Transnational Council - that is diverting comments. Comments need to be inspected for national security clearance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt it is the Transitional Council &#8211; an arm of the Transnational Council &#8211; that is diverting comments. Comments need to be inspected for national security clearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya and the Passive Repeaters: Deploying Depleted Information Warheads by Maximilian Forte</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/27/libya-and-the-passive-repeaters-deploying-depleted-information-warheads/#comment-17621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maximilian Forte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12770#comment-17621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but almost all comments are now ending up in the spam queue, and there is nothing I can do to stop it, except check the queue every now and again for legitimate comments. This might have something to do with Wordpress having been under severe attacks for the past days/weeks, I don&#039;t know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but almost all comments are now ending up in the spam queue, and there is nothing I can do to stop it, except check the queue every now and again for legitimate comments. This might have something to do with WordPress having been under severe attacks for the past days/weeks, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Humanitarian-Militarist Project and the Production of Empire in Libya by Maximilian Forte</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/26/the-humanitarian-militarist-project-and-the-production-of-empire-in-libya/#comment-17620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maximilian Forte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12742#comment-17620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Then what? Watch the mayhem unfold and do nothing?&quot;

Just like you are perfectly willing to do when it comes to Yemen and Bahrain--right now--and countless other local battles before. What do you know about any mayhem, and from whom? I am not denying it, I am questioning the imagined scale of events, the alarmism and hyperbole. I am sorry that I cannot answer your question--it is far too garbled for me to even understand what you are saying.

Anyway, you keep refusing to read...because I went beyond just cutting ties. Again, FINAL PARAGRAPH, John, and check through the last three articles as well. How you imagine that we should all be supporting these rebels, without question, is quite beyond me...and you too apparently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Then what? Watch the mayhem unfold and do nothing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Just like you are perfectly willing to do when it comes to Yemen and Bahrain&#8211;right now&#8211;and countless other local battles before. What do you know about any mayhem, and from whom? I am not denying it, I am questioning the imagined scale of events, the alarmism and hyperbole. I am sorry that I cannot answer your question&#8211;it is far too garbled for me to even understand what you are saying.</p>
<p>Anyway, you keep refusing to read&#8230;because I went beyond just cutting ties. Again, FINAL PARAGRAPH, John, and check through the last three articles as well. How you imagine that we should all be supporting these rebels, without question, is quite beyond me&#8230;and you too apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Libya and the Passive Repeaters: Deploying Depleted Information Warheads by John Allison</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/27/libya-and-the-passive-repeaters-deploying-depleted-information-warheads/#comment-17619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Allison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12770#comment-17619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the part that the USans will not be allowed to see on the mainstream media. 

I was getting swayed toward the viewpoint that had become almost homogeneous across the different voices in the media - &quot;Kadaffi is a Bad Guy; he has done inhumane things to his own people&quot;; even things that overshadow his development of education, medicine and a technologically higher standard of living.  So, i had decided to abandon kadaffi&#039;s revolution and submit to the NATO cure.

Now, I am back to thinking this is what i thought it was from the get-go.

This is the raw facts behind counterinsurgency theory - if we ain&#039;t got no counterinsurgency in a country that is being run by Bad Guys (read Muslims or socialists), then we will create a counterinsurgency and declare them to be the legitimate government, and join them in &quot;repelling&quot; the insurgents, in this case the government of Libya which is referred to as the Gadaffi Regime. 
Yes, the Libyan government is now the insurgent force against the Transitional Council that some foreigners appointed, funded and equipped..

Can humanity be extracted from this assembly line?

Can communities of factory and office employees throw off the corporate managerial regime, reject DoD funds, and regrow genuine culture, minus the military virus, to restore humanity to the human resources? And, then what of the military?  

It has all gotten so ... so ... Sciencefictiony, this assignment you gave me, Max, of demilitarizing the USA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the part that the USans will not be allowed to see on the mainstream media. </p>
<p>I was getting swayed toward the viewpoint that had become almost homogeneous across the different voices in the media &#8211; &#8220;Kadaffi is a Bad Guy; he has done inhumane things to his own people&#8221;; even things that overshadow his development of education, medicine and a technologically higher standard of living.  So, i had decided to abandon kadaffi&#8217;s revolution and submit to the NATO cure.</p>
<p>Now, I am back to thinking this is what i thought it was from the get-go.</p>
<p>This is the raw facts behind counterinsurgency theory &#8211; if we ain&#8217;t got no counterinsurgency in a country that is being run by Bad Guys (read Muslims or socialists), then we will create a counterinsurgency and declare them to be the legitimate government, and join them in &#8220;repelling&#8221; the insurgents, in this case the government of Libya which is referred to as the Gadaffi Regime.<br />
Yes, the Libyan government is now the insurgent force against the Transitional Council that some foreigners appointed, funded and equipped..</p>
<p>Can humanity be extracted from this assembly line?</p>
<p>Can communities of factory and office employees throw off the corporate managerial regime, reject DoD funds, and regrow genuine culture, minus the military virus, to restore humanity to the human resources? And, then what of the military?  </p>
<p>It has all gotten so &#8230; so &#8230; Sciencefictiony, this assignment you gave me, Max, of demilitarizing the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Humanitarian-Militarist Project and the Production of Empire in Libya by John stanfon</title>
		<link>http://zeroanthropology.net/2011/03/26/the-humanitarian-militarist-project-and-the-production-of-empire-in-libya/#comment-17618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John stanfon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroanthropology.net/?p=12742#comment-17618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.medialens.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3849&amp;sid=d3a7971a3fb2d53a4da9722ab013614f

Countermeasures for US Citizens, another article and I think 3 more related to doing some leg work on the anti imperialist side.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.medialens.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3849&#038;sid=d3a7971a3fb2d53a4da9722ab013614f" rel="nofollow">http://www.medialens.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3849&#038;sid=d3a7971a3fb2d53a4da9722ab013614f</a></p>
<p>Countermeasures for US Citizens, another article and I think 3 more related to doing some leg work on the anti imperialist side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
