Emotional pleas from friends, colleagues, and even members of Paula Loyd’s family, including her military fiancé, have poured in to defend Ayala, seeking a light sentence that would exclude any time in prison. Ayala served nine years in the military as a decorated member of the Army Rangers and worked six years as a mercenary in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet, his defense claims, he was not prepared for the “horror” of what happened to Loyd. To be absolutely clear: Ayala executed a subdued detainee, in clear violation of the human rights conventions to which the U.S. is a signatory.

Nonetheless, this has not stopped those who would support Ayala’s heroism in illegally executing an unarmed detainee who could not fight back, having failed in his job of protecting Paula Loyd in the first place. A local “news” service, Nola.com, has gone as far as producing a “documentary” in defense of Don Ayala, shown below. That same source has Ayala rescuing “U.S. hostages from Granada” — they likely meant Grenada, during the 1983 U.S. invasion, also unprovoked, and where there were no U.S. hostages. It’s not the only self-serving and self-glorifying myth presented in this story, and many stemming from this case have already been rubbished on this blog.

Ayala’s legal defense “described” the actions of Abdul Salam as “a violent and incomprehensible attack upon an unarmed, vulnerable American woman who was actively working to improve the lives of all Afghans, including her assailant.” Leaving aside that kind of puffery and the low grade sentimentality, Salam was a member of a vulnerable population under the domination of the U.S. military occupation, who fought back and chose as his target a member of a U.S. military program. The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack. Ayala’s defense claims, as the ultimate challenge to credulity, that the U.S. military is in Afghanistan to improve the lives of the Taliban. The attack on Loyd is only incomprehensible to those who have been nurtured in the propaganda that stipulates that not only is God on America’s side, America is God, and therefore any attack on an American, even one in military uniform and part of an invading force, is an attack on all that is good and holy. Let it be noted that all of this is forthcoming in the same week as news of another indiscriminate massacre of Afghan civilians by the U.S. Air Force, with the deaths of at least 120.

The following article by John Stanton, and the attached court document, were sent to me by John with permission to reproduce it here. John Stanton’s earlier articles on the Human Terrain System are also available here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,  15, and 16.

A warning to readers: some of the photographs that follow show graphic violence.

Before anyone disingenuously protests that Paula Loyd is being used as a “weapon” by opponents of the Human Terrain System, let us keep the facts crystal clear: the only agencies that come anywhere close to having used Loyd almost literally as a weapon are the U.S. Government, the U.S. military, and the Human Terrain System specifically. No longer able to use her as an instrument of war, HTS has found one more use for Loyd: cheesy propaganda that almost has Loyd jumping up, saluting, and winking, following her attack. Americans can be wonderful, can do! types in such familiar renditions of retro-style military propaganda.

Finally, I will respectfully disagree with John on the final section of his article, not necessarily on a factual basis, but for reinforcing the one-sided attention to women’s rights that has become the standard for the war in Afghanistan, as if violence and discrimination against women, including the many reports of violent sexual assaults within the U.S. military itself, not to mention gay bashing (both literal and otherwise), were somehow alien to the U.S. Paula Loyd did not need to travel to Afghanistan to encounter gender discrimination. Paula Loyd did not need to travel to Afghanistan to “help improve people’s lives.” And the U.S. will not be teaching lawfulness and gender equality through illegal executions.

Regardless of the sentence, the case is a farce to begin with. It is another in-house show trial for which the U.S. has become notorious in pursuing its wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

ADDENDUM:

While it is highly unlikely that we will ever know the exact details of the event, especially as absolutely no Afghan eyewitnesses have ever been heard in any report, as if the entire village was absent, one can see from the photographs alone that some details of the official story are suspicious at best. For example, there is no evidence in the photos of any market or bazaar, unless Afghans like to set up their goods in the village drainage ditch. Yet HTS claims Paula Loyd was interviewing Abdul Salam in a market. Also, given the depth of the scorching of the ground, and the details presented by John below, the notion that the flames were quickly or even immediately extinguished is hardly credible. In addition, that ditch does not appear to be a “stream.” One may suspect that by piling dirt on her open wounds, then dragging her on the ground, and then rolling her into what may be sewer water, that Loyd’s injuries were significantly exacerbated.

▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼

USA v Don Ayala:
HTS Management, Army Leadership on Trial Too

06 May 2009

by John Stanton

“This example also provides a glimpse into the type of person that is needed to operate in this environment and the training that must take place in order to effectively work with foreign nationals. Not just anyone can do this kind of work, and there is a need for a set of inherent personality traits needed by operators in order to achieve the desired end state no matter the obstacle. A degree of moral flexibility and an understanding the political and strategic significance of handling delicate cultural issues are just a few of the characteristic needed in order to function in this environment.”–Major Kevin Burke, USA

On May 8, 2009 at 9:00AM Eastern (USA) Don Ayala, a member of a Human Terrain Team (HTT) operating in Afghanistan, will be sentenced by Judge Claude Hilton in the Eastern District Court of Virginia. On February 3, 2009, Ayala pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter of Abdul Salam, an Afghan national who doused Paula Loyd, a fellow HTT member, with a lit container of flammable liquid and set her alight. Loyd suffered burns on 60 percent of her body and ultimately succumbed to her wounds dying on January 7, 2008.

According to court filings, she was “engulfed in a ball of flame large enough to force those near her to involuntarily back away to a distance of 3 to 5 meters”. Loyd screamed in agony as flesh and clothing burned. A US platoon medic tried to put the fire out by using dirt but ultimately dragged her by her foot to a nearby drainage ditch where “helmetfuls” of water were applied to put out the flames. All her clothing burned off leaving only her helmet and body armor intact.

According to court documents, Salam “fled immediately from the scene and ran 50 meters towards Ayala. Ayala drew his sidearm but did not fire and instead pinned Salam on the ground on a commonly traveled path. Salam resisted violently but was eventually flex-cuffed and restrained with the assistance of members of the accompanying platoon. Ayala kept his sidearm “trained at Salam’s head”. Moments later, a US soldier and interpreter approached Ayala and Salam.

The interpreter “yelled at Salam, punched and kicked him and dragged him into an adjacent creek. Ayala retrieved Salam from the creek and put him back on the path,” pinning him down with knee to chest. According to court documents, Ayala was advised of Loyd’s status and subsequently shot Salam in the head killing him instantly. Ayala agreed to the factual nature of these events and entered a plea of voluntary manslaughter.

A photographic packet contained within court filings [see exhibits below] shows US Army’s Criminal Investigative Division (CID) personnel examining the scene and reenacting portions of the crime. The same photographic packet contains an unsettling picture depicting the narrow pathway and the scorched earth where Loyd lay burning. A picture of Salam’s corpse is also included. Tragic events like this one have followed every conquering force that has attempted to pacify Afghanistan. Now it’s the USA’s turn. The Ayala-Loyd-Salam tragedy could very well have been pulled from The Wasted Vigil by Nadem Salem, a novel of war and tragedy in Afghanistan. The Wasted Vigil should be read by anyone deploying to Afghanistan.

Ayala’s defense team has, as expected, argued that the act of manslaughter by Ayala can’t be decoupled from Salam’s assault and, ultimately, murder of Loyd. As such, the defense team argued that “a sentence of three years of supervised probation is sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the sentencing set forth in 18 USC 3553 (a) [Imposition of a Sentence, Factors, etc.]. Any imprisonment of Mr. Ayala would violate the stricture of 3553(a) and further compound the tragedy…”

According to court documents, Ayala, already suffering from prior “dormant combat stress injuries” described the thoughts he felt upon learning of Loyd’s status that would ultimately determine Salam’s fate.

“I was overcome with the horror of what had been done to her, knowing that she was suffering and that she would never be the same, even if she lived. Immediately after the incident I was allowed to go see Paula. I will never forget hearing Paula cry “I’m cold” over and over as the medic tried to treat her wounds.”

Court filings reveal 54 letters of support have been written on behalf of Ayala. The Times-Picayune of Louisiana has also posted a documentary video in support of Ayala here http://www.nola.com/news/?/base/news-1/124158792126600.xml&coll=1.

HTS, COIN, Involvement in Afghan-Pak on Trial

“In this situation, all sense of fairness is shattered and the rules of combat broken. This is not a scenario that anyone is trained for, prepared for…” said LTC David Thomas, USA (Ret.) in a court filing supporting Ayala.

Rules of combat in Afghanistan? Fairness? Why not prepare? Why is this scenario not rehearsed for a country where “western values” do not apply to women?

What the hell is going on with HTS and US Army leadership, training and recruitment!? Does anyone involved (contractors/government) with US Army cultural, human, counterinsurgency efforts actually know what they are doing? Do they really know the environment to which they are sending warfighters and contractors? What’s the end-game in Afghan-Pak?

It is common knowledge that women who are unlucky enough to be born into various tribes in Afghanistan are generally treated horribly. Women have few rights in Afghanistan save the right to be silent, and only speak when spoken to. Beatings are common. Being doused with acid is not uncommon. Women are cautious about reporting crimes committed against them by their male counterparts. “In many parts of the country, a majority of women report being assaulted by their husbands. Global Rights, a Washington, D.C.-based human rights organization, surveyed 5,700 households in 16 of the country’s 32 provinces. Fully 87.2 percent of respondents reported they had experienced at least one form of abuse, which included psychological, physical and sexual acts of violence as well as forced marriages. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported physical violence; many described being regularly punched, kicked, hit with sticks, cut with sharp objects, or having their hair pulled and clothes torn. One child bride, for example, reported that she had been woken up one day by her in-laws pouring a kettle of scalding hot water over her body (http://www.herizons.ca/node/263).

And it seems not much better for young males in Afghanistan. According to Major Kevin Burke writing in Civil Reconnaissance:  Separating the Insurgent from the Population, “…incidents of homosexual rape and bestiality among the Afghans has become an excepted [sic] fact in working with the Afghan nationals and other predominately Islamic countries. The act is not isolated within their military, but is practiced among the rural Afghan nationals and witness by most who spend any significant amount of time living among them. This example also provides a glimpse into the type of person that is needed to operate in this environment and the training that must take place in order to effectively work with foreign nationals. Not just anyone can do this kind of work, and there is a need for a set of inherent personality traits needed by operators in order to achieve the desired end state no matter the obstacle. A degree of moral flexibility and an understanding the political and strategic significance of handling delicate cultural issues are just a few of the characteristic needed in order to function in this environment.”

The Ayala-Loyd-Salam case is a portent for the larger tragedy that is sure to follow as America’s attempt to Westernize Afghanistan and Pakistan gains momentum.

John Stanton is a Virginia based writer specializing in political and national security matters. Reach him at cioran123@yahoo.com.

▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼▲▼

The following photographs were taken by the U.S. military both on the day of the attack, 04 November 2008, and the day after. The rest of the photos can be seen here.

Abdul Salam, lying where he was after shot in the head by Don Ayala, with his hands cuffed behind his back.

Flash burns to Salam's arm

Salam's body in place after the zip-cuffs were cut off. A body bag is in the background. View is from the south end of the alley facing north.

The scorched ground where Paula Loyd lay burning alive after being attacked by Salam.

1LT Pathak demonstrating how Ayala knelt on top of Salam, who was subdued and handcuffed when shot in the head by Ayala.

1LT Pathak demonstrating how Ayala knelt on top of Salam before shooting him in the head.

Perhaps one should rejoice at the sudden, refreshing change where the crowd of “milbloggers” (military bloggers, counter-bloggers, and militarist cheerleaders) has gone silent. What makes the moment difficult to celebrate is that they have chosen to go silent at this time and on this issue — I am referring specifically to this piece:

Some Breaking News on the Human Terrain System:
Death Threats Against Female Colleagues

We are speaking here of persons who are, after all, serving in a military-run program, persons who have served in the military in other capacities previously. Are they the enemy now? Were you not all on the same side? Do you not care about the welfare of those who “serve the country” and who “wear the uniform”? What about the rights of women — remember your massive outpouring of what now appears to have been convenient and selective “grief” over Paula Loyd? Where is your Oprah moment now? Remember your outrage against “Afghan culture” and how the men are like inferior animals who abuse their women? Where is all that patriotism, outrage, and wonderful concern for the rights of women now? Where is you “pitchfork parade”? Where is the barrage of people posting from Afghanistan and ISP’s curiously close to Fort Leavenworth who would rush in here at the first chance they could find to bend the discussions underway so that the appropriate Pentagon or State Department perspective could win the day?

How about you “independent minded” military bloggers? Are you trying your best mime imitation right now? Did you have to choose this moment to practice? Or have your delicate little fingers suddenly gone numb from your latest keyboard commando exercise against the newest traitor who dares to speak an idea, or reveal some information, that you would rather not hear (and therefore want to prevent others from hearing)? Or is it that you left the room, looking for a replacement seat cushion for the next time you dive into cyberspace with your unit of the 101st Chairborne?

Silence is complicity, some say, but it is also moral and intellectual cowardice. For those who doubted, look at how “patriotism” really works, how it abandons or devours its own, while wiping away imaginary tears for “the men and women in uniform” who “proudly serve their country.” But look at them turn away now. That is correct, I am referring to you specifically, the chest-beating, nationalist heroes at:

Abu Muqawama

Blackfive

Feral Jundi

Free Range International

Matt “Mountain Runner” Armstrong

Et tu…Old Blue?

Soldier’s Perspective and the others of the self-proclaimed “Noble Duty Milblogger Coalition”

Small Wars Council

Susan Katz Keating

Zenpundit

…and all the other fine “Milblogs“

As always, however, let us not rush to judgment. They might not all be AWOL in the finest war-faring traditions of their illustrious statesmen, the various chickenhawks known as Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and George aWol Bush. They might simply be MIAs in cyberspace. Prepare your yellow ribbons and appropriate bumper stickers, just in case.

Update: Inconvenient truths? Perhaps, but also a poor definition of “milblogging” at work above. See some of the comments that follow below. See also the addenda to the story linked to above, found in comments on that story.

_______