Wikileaks’ Iraq War Logs: 15,000 New Civilian Deaths Uncovered in Leaked Files

Child baptized at a morgue in Iraq

Republished from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism

October 23rd, 2010  |  by Angus Stickler and Emma Slater

At least 122,000 civilians were killed during the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq, 15,000 more than previously thought. The civilian toll accounts for 80 per cent of all deaths in the Iraq conflict.

The numbers of dead were recorded by coalition troops throughout the conflict. The leaked documents provide the first view of these numbers.

Iraq Body Count (IBC), a London-based group has been analysing the numbers for the past two months, comparing them to an extensive database of civilian deaths in the war it had built up from media reports and other public records.

From IBC’s analysis the U.S. files identify more than 15,000 civilian deaths that never appeared in media reports or public records. This new information pushes the total number of fatalities in the war, including combatants, to more than 150,000.

Loss of life
There are 52,000 war logs that record deaths in Iraq – this includes civilian and coalition casualties, as well as those classed as “enemy kills”. IBC intends to complete a thorough analysis of every file, a process that could take several years.

Related article: Hundreds of civilians gunned down at checkpoints

Already IBC has uncovered thousands of deaths that were never known about. In some, scores of Iraqi civilians were killed in a single incident.

For example, a log taken on October 27 2005 records the deaths of 25 civilians and two Iraqi police officers killed in a tribal attack in the northern province of Diyala, Iraq:

October 27 2005
at 1115c PJCC reports 2x tribes were exchanging [small arms fire], 2x IP were killed in the tribal dispute… the initial attack resulted in possible 25x [Iraqi citizens] KIA.

In another, previously unknown incident on December 19 2004 in Ninewah province, U.S. forces discover 12 murdered civilians:

December 19 2004
At 0820C, 1-24IN reported that a walk in source informed them about 5X dead bodies in a cemetary at [redacted] in Mosul… also discovered 7X more dead bodies at the intersection of RTE [redacted] and [redacted] enroute to retrieve the previous bodies.

In a third example, on January 16 2007, Iraqi police found the bodies of 20 civilians in a mini-van in Baghdad. They had all been murdered.

But it is the smaller cases, where one or two people die, that have so inflated the estimates, says John Sloboda, director of IBC:

“These cases are the ones that tend to get less attention from the press and media – many just don’t get reported,” he told the Bureau.

New details
The war logs supply more than just casualty figures. Many give details of how, when and why civilians died. Some even provide names of the killed and wounded.

On the evening of November 29 2006, Iraqi soldiers made a gruesome discovery near the city of Baquba, in Diyala province.

The following day, a Reuters report said: “Iraqi soldiers have found 28 bodies in a mass grave near the volatile city of Baquba, the U.S. military said in a statement on Thursday. The statement gave no details of how they had died, whether they were all men or included women and children.”

Related article: U.S. troops fail to record civilian deaths in one of Iraq’s bloodiest battles

The U.S. military file sheds more light on the event, listing the names of the deceased, one by one. This information will be used by IBC to bolster the Reuters report, giving vital details to the families of the deceased.

US under-counts civilian deaths
The U.S. files record just over 66,000 civilian deaths. This falls well below IBC’s total figure. The discrepancy appears because of under-reporting in the U.S. files, particularly when logging civilian casualties in air strikes.

On September 9 2009, U.S. forces launched an air assault on Tal Afar, a suspected haven for foreign fighters. The U.S. military report is short and to the point: 102 enemies killed in action. There is no mention of civilian casualties.

In a press statement, the U.S. military described the bombardment as “precise and accurate fire”. But contemporaneous media reports show that the civilian toll was severe:

“There is bombing everywhere and my cousin was killed by a rocket when he was trying to get his family out of the city,’ said Bashir Abboosh, a 41-year-old sheep farmer. For long periods, witnesses said, the fighting prevented ambulances from collecting the wounded and the dead. The director of the Tal Afar hospital, Dr Fawzi Ahmed, said that his hospital had seen 45 dead and more than 80 wounded, most of them civilians.” New York Times, September 10 2009.

IBC’s database collated nine press reports of this incident over the following seven days. The final reports state: “The fighting killed 55 civilians and 70 insurgents.”

The human cost of war
Sloboda believes the release of the documents is vital to the public interest.

“There will be thousands of names in these files which will help families trace their missing loved ones. There are no memorials listing all the names of civilians killed in the course of this conflict – our ultimate aim is to help achieve this,” he says.

2 thoughts on “Wikileaks’ Iraq War Logs: 15,000 New Civilian Deaths Uncovered in Leaked Files

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Wikileaks’ Iraq War Logs: 15,000 New Civilian Deaths Uncovered in Leaked Files « ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY --

  2. Maximilian Forte

    Interesting phenomenon related to how people read and comment on blogs: here are some of the most popular articles I have ever published on this site, and one might not know it from looking at the minimal level of ratings and the absence of comments. Instead, all the activity and rating appears over in Reddit:

    Wikileaks’ Iraq War Logs: Hundreds of Civilians Gunned Down at Checkpoints

    Wikileaks’ Iraq War Logs: 15,000 New Civilian Deaths Uncovered in Leaked Files

    Wikileaks’ Iraq War Logs: Torture Widespread in Iraqi Detention Facilities

    Wikileaks’ Iraq War Logs: Obama Administration Handed Over Detainees Despite Reports of Torture

    And on sites that have reposted from this one. I am not aware that even the BIJ’s original articles themselves circulated so much.

Comments are closed