Julian Assange: The Truth Will Always Win

Written by Julian Assange, editor-in-chief of Wikileaks, as published originally in The Australian (07 December 2010):

IN 1958 a young Rupert Murdoch, then owner and editor of Adelaide’s The News, wrote: “In the race between secrecy and truth, it seems inevitable that truth will always win.”

His observation perhaps reflected his father Keith Murdoch’s expose that Australian troops were being needlessly sacrificed by incompetent British commanders on the shores of Gallipoli. The British tried to shut him up but Keith Murdoch would not be silenced and his efforts led to the termination of the disastrous Gallipoli campaign.

Nearly a century later, WikiLeaks is also fearlessly publishing facts that need to be made public.

I grew up in a Queensland country town where people spoke their minds bluntly. They distrusted big government as something that could be corrupted if not watched carefully. The dark days of corruption in the Queensland government before the Fitzgerald inquiry are testimony to what happens when the politicians gag the media from reporting the truth.

These things have stayed with me. WikiLeaks was created around these core values. The idea, conceived in Australia , was to use internet technologies in new ways to report the truth.

WikiLeaks coined a new type of journalism: scientific journalism. We work with other media outlets to bring people the news, but also to prove it is true. Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately?

Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest. WikiLeaks has revealed some hard truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars, and broken stories about corporate corruption.

People have said I am anti-war: for the record, I am not. Sometimes nations need to go to war, and there are just wars. But there is nothing more wrong than a government lying to its people about those wars, then asking these same citizens to put their lives and their taxes on the line for those lies. If a war is justified, then tell the truth and the people will decide whether to support it.

If you have read any of the Afghan or Iraq war logs, any of the US embassy cables or any of the stories about the things WikiLeaks has reported, consider how important it is for all media to be able to report these things freely.

WikiLeaks is not the only publisher of the US embassy cables. Other media outlets, including Britain ‘s The Guardian, The New York Times, El Pais in Spain and Der Spiegel in Germany have published the same redacted cables.

Yet it is WikiLeaks, as the co-ordinator of these other groups, that has copped the most vicious attacks and accusations from the US government and its acolytes. I have been accused of treason, even though I am an Australian, not a US, citizen. There have been dozens of serious calls in the US for me to be “taken out” by US special forces. Sarah Palin says I should be “hunted down like Osama bin Laden”, a Republican bill sits before the US Senate seeking to have me declared a “transnational threat” and disposed of accordingly. An adviser to the Canadian Prime Minister’s office has called on national television for me to be assassinated. An American blogger has called for my 20-year-old son, here in Australia, to be kidnapped and harmed for no other reason than to get at me.

And Australians should observe with no pride the disgraceful pandering to these sentiments by Prime Minister Gillard and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have not had a word of criticism for the other media organisations. That is because The Guardian, The New York Times and Der Spiegel are old and large, while WikiLeaks is as yet young and small.

We are the underdogs. The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn’t want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings.

Has there been any response from the Australian government to the numerous public threats of violence against me and other WikiLeaks personnel? One might have thought an Australian prime minister would be defending her citizens against such things, but there have only been wholly unsubstantiated claims of illegality. The Prime Minister and especially the Attorney-General are meant to carry out their duties with dignity and above the fray. Rest assured, these two mean to save their own skins. They will not.

Every time WikiLeaks publishes the truth about abuses committed by US agencies, Australian politicians chant a provably false chorus with the State Department: “You’ll risk lives! National security! You’ll endanger troops!” Then they say there is nothing of importance in what WikiLeaks publishes. It can’t be both. Which is it?

It is neither. WikiLeaks has a four-year publishing history. During that time we have changed whole governments, but not a single person, as far as anyone is aware, has been harmed. But the US , with Australian government connivance, has killed thousands in the past few months alone.

US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates admitted in a letter to the US congress that no sensitive intelligence sources or methods had been compromised by the Afghan war logs disclosure. The Pentagon stated there was no evidence the WikiLeaks reports had led to anyone being harmed in Afghanistan . NATO in Kabul told CNN it couldn’t find a single person who needed protecting. The Australian Department of Defence said the same. No Australian troops or sources have been hurt by anything we have published.

But our publications have been far from unimportant. The US diplomatic cables reveal some startling facts:

The US asked its diplomats to steal personal human material and information from UN officials and human rights groups, including DNA, fingerprints, iris scans, credit card numbers, internet passwords and ID photos, in violation of international treaties. Presumably Australian UN diplomats may be targeted, too.

King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia asked the US Officials in Jordan and Bahrain want Iran ‘s nuclear program stopped by any means available.

Britain’s Iraq inquiry was fixed to protect “US interests”.

Sweden is a covert member of NATO and US intelligence sharing is kept from parliament.

The US is playing hardball to get other countries to take freed detainees from Guantanamo Bay . Barack Obama agreed to meet the Slovenian President only if Slovenia took a prisoner. Our Pacific neighbour Kiribati was offered millions of dollars to accept detainees.

In its landmark ruling in the Pentagon Papers case, the US Supreme Court said “only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government”. The swirling storm around WikiLeaks today reinforces the need to defend the right of all media to reveal the truth.


10 thoughts on “Julian Assange: The Truth Will Always Win

  1. Pingback: Julian Assange: The Truth Will Always Win « ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY « Yahyasheikho786's Blog

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Julian Assange: The Truth Will Always Win « ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY -- Topsy.com

  3. Clive Palmer

    Hello Julian

    Well I suppose you cannot answer presently due to other commitments. In protective custody LOL. As a fellow Australian and Queenslander and indeed advocate of free speech and “real” antiwar activist, I feel I must comment. The problem – as you know, is that it is difficult to find these releases credible in the main because the patterns are pretty bloody obvious. ‘Scientific journalism – give me a break! Also Sweden has always been the covert operative – as tigger says – its what Swedens do best. The point is that the principal allegation against you is that you work for the CIA and this whole release is a pretext – an asuaging of the masses, mass media, gearing us for the coming conflict between the allies and XXXXX. This will obviously be the biggest conflict in human history and the US’s systematic and otherwise “very undiplomatic” release will create a fertile environment for the germination of that conflict. Its a very targetted release and it is volumnous!

    My question to you or rather your wikicolleagues er hiccup CIA is this: Why this path now? I will guarantee none of you have a clue why you are doing what you are doing – that is the tragedy. The irony is that in the world of mass communication we are more in the dark than ever


    1. Maximilian Forte


      Good god, is this the nutty half-baked conspiracy theory you were trying to push me to write for you all along, with all those ham-fisted attempts at working your theory into some pseudo-credibility by using obscure and irrelevant Levi-Strauss quotes? All those loony cryptic messages…and it comes down to this?

      The patterns are “obvious” and therefore the documents are not “credible.” Wow.

      Your comment was approved for amusement only.

  4. CM

    One cable I found very interesting was a nineteen-page account of a meeting between Russia and the U.S. regarding Iran’s missile capability – nukes or no nukes, possibility of carry a nuke on an ICBM, mobile or stationary platforms, range, intentions. etc.

    What it came down to was an exhaustive and detailed study by Russia that, due to lack of materials and infrastructure, the chance of Iran launching a long-range strike of whatever kind was nil at the present time(2009), and 5-7 years for missile development, 6-10 years for missile launch capability, if in fact Iran decided it wanted to go in that direction.

    Russia was more interested in the circumstances that would make Iran want to develop such weapons capability.

    The American response? They “believed” Iran had both the weapons and the delivery systems to launch strikes against Europe.

    Hard evidence? None.

    D0 people not have a right to know the lies or “beliefs” that could start another world war?

    The gossipy nature of a lot of the stuff just shows, as one person put it, that the diplomatic corps is seriously lacking in both talent and intelligence (both takes on that word). I think that’s what they’re really afraid might come out – if anybody’s listening.

    Meanwhile, I was strangely relieved that Assange was actually being held without bail at the moment. It may be the one place where he’s safe from those who have decided that he is an embarrassment that must be shut up permanently. U.K. judges are an interesting lot – intelligent, with a love for the law and not much patience with those who try to do an end run around it. I keep hoping they held him for his own good.

  5. Elizabeth

    He is safe from the general public; but he is not safe from those within the gaol. For instance earlier this year a man was murdered inside and it is still “unexplained”. Hopefully he will be fine as he is only in the introductory wing. Still, I expect it is more than a little unnerving.

  6. Maximilian Forte

    Hi CM, I found the very same documents to which you refer to be quite damning of the U.S. position on Iran. Actually, even now, with just around 1/250th of the total number of cables released, we already have a substantial mass of information that should make any sober, educated, rational person develop a far more critical perspective on U.S. power than they might have previously entertained.

    I also hope that Julian takes the time to catch up on sleep, he must have been badly frazzled by this point (uploading documents, corresponding with media partners, fending off attacks, dealing with financial strangulation, battling U.S. maneuvers, dealing with this legal case). Hopefully he won’t spend the nights simply pacing his room and thinking and thinking.

  7. Pingback: Julian Assange: The Truth Will Always Win (via ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY) | First Praxis

Comments are closed